23/04/2013
Where Stigma is the Pride-
|
15 April, 2013, Delhi 16 December, 2012 21February, 2013 17 April,2013 11 August,2012 14 January,2013 12 January,2013 18 July,2012 July,2012 16 September,2009 2003 1979- 1980 ____________________________________________________________________ While the whole nation is in flame against the brutal abuse of a 5 year old girl child in Delhi , I am drawn to other recent events of national outrage and there is a streak of commonality. Perpetrators of most heinous crimes can be traced to the state of Bihar. The Chief Minister who applauds his Bihar model of Development and organizes Bihar Diwas nationwide is no where to be seen condemning the despicable acts of his fellow citizens. Nitish Kumar claims himself to be the one who upturned the wheel of progress for Bihar, and it is his moral duty to take responsibility for such ghastly acts and at least send out a message to the Biharis not to insult the glorious tradition of Bihar. If Narendra Modi is culpable for Gujarat carnage in the worldview of Nitish Kumar’s party; by the same analogy, many would make Nitish Kumar responsible for creating plethora of psychologically abnormal men who are bringing disrepute to Bihar and India in the comity of nation. This is not a complete picture of indulgence of fellow Biharis in brutal crimes. The list of incidents merely reflect the unchanging general mindset of masculine, testosterone-accelerated behaviors of Biharis. Add to it the celebration in Bihar for the films like Gangs of Wasseypur ,Shool or Dabang series or the Bollywood songs that portrays Bihariness as brazen hooliganism where woman’s body is merely something to be appropriated wildly. Bihariness has come to symbolize vacuity of aesthetics, sensibility, and subtlety of expression. Biharism as a mindset is atavistic, and anti-civilizational . Biharism is growing barrier-free since the State government has generated a false sense of pride among the least achievers through simulacral politics of fake branding. There is an abnormal case among Biharis who discover self-esteem in stigma. Bakhtiyar Khilji encamped at modern Bakhtiyarpur and then went to nearby Nalanda and destroyed the monastery during the 12th century , killed the monk-practitioners and burnt the biggest treasure of knowledge stored at Nalanda library. The event is a stigma in the glorious history of Bihar . Yet, Bakhtiyarpur city was founded to commemorate the said event. Even the loud –mouth Chief Minister , Nitish Kumar belongs to this city. Another town just 10 kms from the capital Patna has etymological roots in the same shameful event of history. It is at Fatwah that Bakhtiyar Khilji was said to have issued fatwa, a religiously ordained dictate against non-believers in Islam, against the Nalanda monks. Another nearby town is Khusropur . Khusro was a companion of Bakhtiyar Khilji from whose name, the name is derived. There is mention of an imposter Khusro who lived east of Patna and later captured by Jehangir’s Mughal army. Probably, this story is also behind the naming of the small suburb, Khusropur. How is the names commemorating the worst deed of Indian history still being perpetuated in popular psyche ? But, if the little places have lost their history of connection with Islamic past even though the past does not represent repression or violence; why do the names like Bakhtiyarpur, Fatwah and Khusropur evoke no apathy in the minds of the natives? The social psychologists can work on the politics of nomenclature, and the selective effect of political dynamics over memory and nomenclatures and the politics of proper name itself. A Xuanjang would be surprised to visit the state again. There is no trace of Nalanda wisdom. Nalanda tradition exists in popular memory only through the concept of Bhuskol. A dull student is called bhuskol. Someone who is lazy and does not make effort is a bhuskol. There is an idiom, “Bhuskol vidyarthi ka basta bhari”(a dull student carrying so many books). But the genealogy of the term reveals the chink in the popular perception. Shantideva ,the great Nalanda Master whose treatise on the way of Bodhisattava(Bodhicharyavatara) has great influence on the current Dalai Lama was one of the 84 great Mahasiddhas who lived in Nalanda during 8th centiry.His nickname was Bhusukapa. It is said that he even won debates with Sankaracharya. The Tibetan hagiographers held him in high esteem. Both Taranath and Buston wrote about him. In recent times, Kunzang Pelden, has narrated his biography in the famous work, The Nectar of Manjushri’s Speech-A Detailed Commentary on Shantideva’s way of Bodhisattava(2007) The story of great Shantideva as the Bhusku is preserved in local memories as “bhuskol”, even though no one knows about Shantideva in popular memories. The identity-formation in Bihar raises serious doubts over the issue of identity itself. Do people selectively prefer to appropriate the proud moments of their history to create a communitarian identity? Is the self-esteem propeller of quest for self-identity? Is the worthiness the only criteria for construction of group identity? How is that the people of Bihar have chosen the stigmas from local history and still feel self-pride in the identity construction? Is this an aberration? Why are there no legacy of philosophical tradition visible in the Nalanda neighbourhood? How can Nalanda tradition be mere preserved in negativities in contemporary history? These are open-ended questions. Bihari mindset celebrates the most despicable events of their history . There is no Buddha, no Ashoka, no Gupta, no Aryabhatta, no Padamsambhava, no Shantideva, no Rahulbhadra, no Nagarjuna, no Mahavira… They remember their victors—Bakhtiyar Khilji, imposter Khusro . Biharis are happy to be depicted as villain in Gangs of Wasseypur or at portrayal of a corrupt Bihari police official. Something is fundamentally wrong in Bihari social milieu. No outsider wants to come to Bihar. No company wants to invest in Bihar inspite of umpteen effort made by Nitish Kumar through mammoth propaganda machinery. People have horrific experience passing through Bihar either on road or in trains. Buddhists pray the next Buddha to never be connected with Bihar. Bihar is a badland of globalization. Functional democracy , dysfunctional culture. Functional state, dysfunctional society. Functional babus, dysfunctional people. It is exceptional state under ontological oscillation. Why do Biharis enjoy behaving like ruffians at home and abroad? And why do Biharis , inspite of caste and religious division, share a sense of comradeship even in crime? The anger of nation against Delhi Police Commissioner, Neeraj Kumar stems from this fact. People perceive him to be hand in glove with the demonic rapist from Bihar. And nation also feels that the Home Secretary who hails from Bihar is protecting his protégée Police Commissioner. Why cannot vocal Biharis come forward and criticize and demand action against a foolhardy Police Commissioner who tried to fabricate case of murder against innocent protesters only few months back? Where are Bihar’s vocal leaders and pleaders? Bihar is caught in a time warp. The mindset to treat the “other’ as something to be robbed by force is reminiscent of medieval thuggery. Biharis treat public property as something to be looted, may it be electric wire on poles , street lights, stools from public Parks or bulbs and fans in train compartments or women in public place. To make Biharis to behave and follow the rule of law is a challenging task. This can be done only by eliminating Biharism- the mindset to celebrate Stigma as Pride. For that, the simplest way is to raise the women-power in Bihar. We need Gulabi gangs in Bihar. There are proto-groups like Durga Vahini. But, this has to be a state wide movement. Women in Bihar will become bolder both in home and in society. Biharis cannot learn to respect women with persuasion. Coerce the Coarse! Let this slogan be the antidote to Bihariism! (Niraj Kumar hails from Bihar. He is the President, Society for Asian Integration)
|