|  While Narendra Modi's diatribes at a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)   meeting - he compared the Congress with termites - reflected the   customary crudeness of his cyber supporters, Prime Minister Manmohan   Singh's riposte in parliament was reminiscent of his combative comments   on the eve of the 2009 general election.
 At that time, he had   countered L.K. Advani's charge of being weak by recalling how the BJP   leader moped in a corner while his riotous followers demolished an   ancient mosque. This time, too, Manmohan Singh taunted the BJP by   predicting that the failure of the party's "lauh purush" (iron man) to   dislodge the Congress will be repeated in 2014.
 
 The prime   minister's other jibe directed at Advani in 2009 was to change his   astrologers. Now, with just about a year to go before the next big   electoral test between the two major parties, those who peer into the   future will be hard put to find out which of the two have an advantage.
 
 Only   one thing is clear. While the Congress has squandered the lead provided   by the 200-plus seats it won in the last election, the BJP hasn't been   able to step into the breach. One reason for its failure is that it   hasn't yet been able to fill the vacuum created by Atal Behari   Vajpayee's retirement.
 
 Shortly after the 2009 defeat, Advani's   willingness to be leader of the opposition alerted the BJP to his desire   to be a prime ministerial candidate again. To abort this possibility,   the party kicked him upstairs by making him chairman of the party   parliamentary board and appointing Sushma Swaraj as leader of the   opposition in the Lok Sabha.
 
 The belief at the time that the   number of prime ministerial aspirants had been brought down to two -   Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley - was however negated by Modi's decision   to throw his hat into the ring.
 
 Even if none of this is formally   articulated by the BJP, the suggestions of its partners in the National   Democratic Alliance (NDA) provide enough indications about the prospects   of the front-runners.
 
 For instance, while Bihar Chief Minister   Nitish Kumar has expressed his reservations about Modi obviously because   the latter's nomination will scare away large sections of the   minorities - Muslims and Christians - the Shiv Sena has voiced its   preference for Sushma Swaraj presumably because, as a party of   Maharashtrians, it will not like a Gujarati, viz. Modi, to be prime   minister.
 
 It may be recalled that in the presidential election of   2007, the Shiv Sena had voted for the Congress' Pratibha Patil, who is a   Maharashtrian, instead of the BJP's Bhairon Singh Shekhawat. This time,   too, the Sena - and the Janata Dal-United (JD-U) - opted for the   Congress's Pranab Mukherjee. Evidently, when it comes to making a major   choice, the BJP's friends prefer to go their own way on communal,   personal (in the case of Mukherjee) and provincial considerations.
 
 For   all the cheers that Modi receives, therefore, at the BJP's conclaves,   the chances of the party finally choosing him are not too high since it   will create unmanageable cracks in the NDA. The Congress'   none-too-subtle overtures to Nitish Kumar with assurances of considering   his demand for a special economic status for Bihar are not without   significance in this context.
 
 But, it isn't only the BJP which is   unable to decide on a prime ministerial nominee. Although Rahul   Gandhi's elevation to the post of Congress vice president seemingly   confirmed the belief that he will be the candidate, the heir-apparent   himself has been hesitant.
 
 His latest ruminations in parliament's   central hall echo what he said at the Congress' last Jaipur conclave   about the party functioning without rules and decisions being taken   behind closed doors. While emphasising his bottom-up idea of empowerment   although he himself has parachuted down from above, Rahul has however   clarified that since he is "not in politics for the sake of power",   becoming prime minister "is not a priority" for him.
 
 It is not   clear whether he is serious. Or whether there is a game plan behind his   renunciation like his mother's in 2004 when she chose Manmohan Singh for   the post after refusing to accept it herself.
 
 There is little   doubt, of course, that the Congress will follow whatever path is laid   down for it by the dynasty. It is possible that Manmohan Singh will be   named again on the eve of the polls. Or the matter will be kept open for   the newly elected MPs. Or Rahul himself will decide to take the plunge.
 
 For   the Congress, much will depend on how the economy fares. An upturn will   probably see Manmohan Singh for another two years. A downturn may   induce the party to play the Rahul card.
 
 For the BJP, there are   two worse case scenarios. One is that Modi's selection will make the NDA   fall apart, and the other is that Modi's rejection will turn the   Gujarat strong man into a dangerous rebel.
 
 
 
   |