|     
     | 
    
    (Bihar Times) Either one group kills the  other, or one group moves out of the country, or both groups prosper  together.  First option is impossible to  achieve, second option is impractical, and the third requires commitment from  both communities.  What we have been  experiencing, for quite sometime, from north to south and east to west, is that  a growing number of people, on both sides, is trying to accomplish the first  option, at the cost of innocent lives, and a few are attempting the third  alternative.  As a result, we have seen  bloodshed, blown up body parts, broken properties, and bulged eyes of humans  who have been weeping and wondering how to go on without the dead loved ones. 
    
  Will  one community be able to eradicate the other? 
  Never.  Look at history.  Adolf Hitler and his army in Germany could  not kill all the Jews.  Once both tribes  lived peacefully in central Africa, and then in 1994 the Hutu tribe attempted  to eliminate Tutsi tribe in Rwanda and failed.   The militias from Hutu majority killed Tutsi minority and moderate  Hutus; in nearly 100 days of killing, what came to known as Rwandan Genocide,  as many as 10 Lakhs humans were slaughtered.  The ethnic conflict between the Serbs and  Croats and Muslims, what came to known as the Bosnian War, from 1992 to 1995,  in former Yugoslavia, killed nearly 1 Lakh people, and no one group  disappeared.    The ethnic and tribal  conflict in Darfur region of Sudan has been going on since 2003 and has claimed  nearly 4 Lakhs lives.  In primeval  period, long before modern day communal conflicts, one tribe believed that the  other tribes were its prey and should be captured, conquered, or killed.  But it did not succeed.   
  Eradicating  humans is like eradicating mosquitoes.  A  swamp, for example, can never be made free of mosquitoes.  No matter how often you spray the chemicals  or use other remedies to kill them, they keep on growing and multiplying.  Like mosquitoes humans, too, populate and  cannot be eradicated. 
     
  Who  do you blame for conflicts? 
  I  believe our nation’s bad economic conditions have a lot to do with communal  wars rather than the reasons we commonly hear like Hindus and Musalmans hate  each other, they distrust each other, dislike each other, detest each other’s  lifestyles, abhor each other’s religion, despise each other’s values, and so  and on. 
  Our  nation’s public as well as private institutions have failed to keep up with the  essential things that our ever-rising population needs to survive.  They have failed to come up with enough food  to feed the hungry, enough affordable clinics to treat the sick and disabled,  enough homes to live in, enough schools and colleges to teach the kids, enough  work to employ workers, enough means of production for people to produce goods,  and enough resources to help the victims of disasters.  So it is no wonder that every now and then  our country turns into a crucible of conflicts. 
  What  are the harmful effects of conflicts? 
  One  of the most harmful effects of communal violence is the anxiety level seen on  faces of parents and children.  Parents  worry if their children are safe and sound when they are away from home.  Likewise children when they are in schools  worry about the safety of their parents.   Worries become reality when one hears about or eyewitnesses the scene of  parents’ heart piercing cries near their injured or dead child, in some cases  only child.  Equally heart breaking is a  story of a child’s tears near the injured or dead parent or parents who got  caught in the cross fires between Hindus and Musalmans.  And this is the tragedy of communal  violence.   
  Once  the carnage is over it is hard to imagine how could the survivors of senseless  killing continue with their lives.  They  could never be adequately condoled, consoled, comforted, or compensated.  The holes in their hearts and wallets will  remain unfilled.  And this is the tragedy  of communal violence. 
  If  one has to live in a nation that is embroiled in communal wars, one will  constantly live in fear and insecurity.   Such environment may encourage people to get involved in planning the  deaths and destruction of foes in order to protect the family causing the  nation to drift into a period of no order and no stability.  And this is the tragedy of communal violence.  
  The  communal wars cost money.  Somebody is  going to have to pay for bombs, for medical services to treat those who are  injured, for funerals of those who are dead, and for rebuilding of destroyed or  damaged properties.  Not only human  insanity kills or injures lives but wastes money and reduces rupees from  purses of both people and governments – city, state, and central.  As such we are poor and communal clashes make  us poorer.  And this is the tragedy of  communal violence.   
  The  war – communal or racial or religious or civil – between men of the same nation  is likely to be more costly, bloody and longer than wars between nations.    When we have a war within us how can we get  ahead in life?  How can we gain happiness  by killing citizens of our own country?   And this is the tragedy of communal violence. 
  When  children see that grown-ups are involved in hating and killing members of the  other community, they, too, will learn to harbor animosity and will carry on  what their elders have been doing.  Which  generation will come to a sense and end the communal wars?  And this is the tragedy of communal violence. 
  How  to curb conflicts? 
  Some  say Hindus and Musalmans should learn to live together, but this implies that  they should tolerate each other, share things that support human lives, share  poverty, share misery, share blames, set aside seats in schools and colleges  for children of each community, set aside government-jobs for adults of each  community, and so on.   
  I  say grow together. Economically.  Make  the national economic cake bigger so everyone can have as much as one  wants.  It is hard to imagine peace  within our nation if we continue to ignore unthinkable, unbelievable, and  unspeakable human sufferings.  Therefore,  let the hands of both communities guard streets and peoples and properties,  start anew shops and factories, replace useless policies, politicians and  power-holders, remove outdated laws, and abandon socialism that has caused  scarcity of everything: jobs, facilities, goods, and services.  After all peace and profit are desirable over  the loot and loss.  Financially secured  and physically safe Hindus and Musalmans will have no incentive to loot; they  have nothing to gain from killing and a great deal to lose.  
  So  it is not the eradication of enemies but protecting each other and producing  together goods and services in a free market economy that is likely to  safeguard individual rights and help us and our children and grandchildren live  in peace, prosperity, harmony, and safety.   We the people must arise, awake, and stop not until we solve our  economic problems, otherwise we shall never have a peaceful paradise. 
  
  
  Comments... 
  
  
    
      
        
          
            
                
                  
                    Could not have agreed more with the sentiments. A healthy dose of doubt in   matters of religion is necessary for peaceful coexistance. We might notice the   ones who are more assured about their belief act most violent in name of   religion. Always remember nobody really has defintive answer on religious   matters. As long as this respectful doubt is there no one can convince anyone to   harm others in name of the faith. I mean how do you take sword in name of a   tenet when you aren't sure that that tenet is completely right in first   place. 
                       
                      Peace 
                      Anil 
                     
                    --------------- 
                    I agree with Gandhiji that ethnic cleansing has never been a   solution to the menace of communal discord and it can never be. History and   common sense should always prevail that one cannot just drive the other   community out. It is just not feasible. The only practical and rational solution   to this conflict is PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE. It is not an alternative among many   others, but the only option. Towards this end, I feel that Anil has captured the   essence and soul of communal harmony in a very succinct way.  
                       
                      It is a   minimum requirement that our so called religious leaders stop misguiding people   by incorrectly teaching them that if you do not follow their religion, you are   definitely HELL bound in afterlife. I am a Hindu by birth and practice, but I   had the pleasure of bowing in several mosques, kneeling in umpteen churches, and   praying in at least two synagogues spread among four continents. During a Bible   class in a particular church (in USA), I was taught that (1) being Christian   means being Republican, (2) being Christian means being straight, (3) being   Christian means being anti-abortion, among many other notable teachings not   related to religion by any stretch of imagination. (As you might known   Christianity has many sects: Catholic, Protestants, Methodist, Orthodox,   Mormon,...) During a particular Bible class (again in USA), I was taught that   all those who do not believe in their SECT will definitely go to HELL after   death. This is height of religious intolerance. This must be stopped for   religious harmony. 
                       
                      Secondly, I strongly feel that the institutions of   religion and politics be made separate and totally independent of each other. It   is only when people start mixing religion with politics that communal flares   start rising up. There should be absolutely no interference between these two   institutions. One politician or one political party should not be allowed speak   on the behalf of the entire religion. Our religious and political leaders should   not teach us anything otherwise. 
                       
                      Religious brainwashing is another   serious issue. I believe that it is in you to be good citizens. Our religious   advisers should not lead us to anything less than a perfect citizen. A great   Lebanese-American artist, poet, writer, philosopher and theologian, Khalil   Gibran captures the essence of religion beautifully: 
                       
                      Vain are the   beliefs and teachings that make man miserable, and false is the goodness that   leads him into sorrow and despair, for it is man's purpose to be happy on this   earth and lead the way to felicity and preach its gospel wherever he goes. He who does not see the kingdom of heaven in this   life will never see it in the coming life. We came not into this life by   exile, but we came as innocent creatures of God, to learn how to worship the   holy and eternal spirit and seek the hidden secrets within ourselves from the   beauty of life. 
                       
                        
                      Pradeep 
                    pkr5ul@gmail.com 
                   
                 
             
             |  
        
       
     
   
  ------------------------------------------------------ 
  
  
    
      
        
          
            
                
                  
                  
                    
                      
                        We don’t think there is a big   conflict between Hindu & Muslim. A group of people’s views is not views of   all. However, there is need to improve the relation. It can only be possible if   the majority (Hindu) tries to provide justice to the minority (Muslims and   others). They are victim of injustice from Hindus, at both government and   private levels.
                               Minority are children of majority.   If Hindus are actually serious, they must come forward to give   justice to them at any cost. The Indian government has greater roll to play in   it by urging Hindus, using communication facilities, to provide them the due   justice. If any law & order-maintaining agency does injustice to minorities,   Hindus should come forward to help them and report the matter to government   through Media, etc.
                             Be good with them, they will be   better with you..
                             Gudri Shah   
                            
                            
                             Jeddah 
                            gudrishah2004@yahoo.com  | 
                       
                    
                   
                 
             
             |  
        
       
     
   
  --------------------------------------------- 
  First and foremost things is that all abrahmic religion should stop preaching the canard that if you are not Christian?jew/Muslim then you are going to hell. It might come of harsh but that's what precisely they perpetrate. Once you preach this there is not much you can do to bridge the gap. In my view this is the cornerstone of all the differences. 
    It's high time now that preaching of sarv-dharm-sambhaw starts by non-hindu religions too. I have seen dharma Gurus preaching this in talk shows for public consumption but visit Church or Mosque the tone changes. You are hell-bound if you are not one of them. Time has come to bring consistency in what they say in talk shows and what they say behind public glare of camera. All that we are seeing is reactionary actions all emanating from this major conflict. 
  Anil Kumar 
  akanhaiya@yahoo.com 
   
     
  
  
  
   
  
  
 
   
   
  
  
    
     
   
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
    |